Should The Yankees Be Pursuing A Big Name Free Agent?

When the Yankees missed the playoffs in 2008 for the first time in 14 years ownership decided to make a splash. That off-season the team committed a total of $423.5 million to Mark Teixeira, CC Sabathia, and AJ Burnett to an already existing group of star players. The plan worked perfectly. New York won the World Series that very next year and made the playoffs in every season trough 2012. When the team missed the postseason again in 2013 the front office doubled down on the big spending strategy. 

This time they committed $438 million to Masahiro Tanaka, Jacoby Ellsbury, Brian McCann, and Carlos Beltran to an already aging roster. Unfortunately for Yankee fans the plan didn't work this time. New York missed the playoffs again in 2014, lost the wild card game in 2015, and missed postseason play again this past season. For those of you counting at home that's three of the past four seasons the Yankees haven't participated in the MLB playoffs. 

At the 2016 trade deadline the front office was able to, for the first time in years, make progress at building the next great Yankee team.  More than anything else the roster was finally able to get younger. Alex Rodriguez and Teixeira retired. General Manager Brian Chasman traded Beltran, Aroldis Chapman, and Andrew Miller for a haul of top prospects. The moves not only shed payroll but the now baby Yankees surprisingly played better than they had all season. From August 1st through the end of the season they played their best baseball of the season, finishing seven games above .500 during this time. 

The biggest development for the franchise during this time was the play of rookie catcher Gary Sanchez. The 23-year-old came in hot and became the first player ever with at least 11 homers and 31 hits in his first 23 MLB games. Overall in just 53 games Sanchez hit 20 homers with a .299/.367/.657 triple slash line. Although it was a small sample size his .657 slugging percentage would have been the highest in all of baseball had he played a full season. He finished second in the Rookie of the Year voting but would have run away with the award had he played even half of a full season.

Now the franchise has a big decision to make. Early this off-season the team has been tied to several big name free agents such as Chapman, Beltran, and Yoenis Cespedes. Of the three Cespedes would be the biggest mistake New York could make. Realistically the Yankees aren't ready to compete for a championship in 2017, and signing Yo to a five year deal would limit payroll flexibility when the team is actually ready to make a splash.

It's tougher to argue against signing Chapman and Beltran, but for different reasons. Chapman has said he wants $100 million, which would double Jonathan Papelbon's record $50 million deal as the highest ever for a reliever. $100 million is insane but if the asking price comes down it's tough to argue against building a dominant bullpen led by Chapman and Dellin Betances after we saw how relievers were used during these past playoffs. Beltran, meanwhile, could be a fine short term signing. He could provide power, leadership, and be used as trade bait once again should New York be out of contention come July. 

Last winter the Yankees were surprisingly the only team to not sign a single free agent. The plan for the past couple of years has been to wait out these giant contracts, shed payroll, get younger, and wait for the insane 2018 free agent class to make a splash. Now the front office has a lot of money to play with but it would be wise for them to stay patient. The spending spree after 2008 made sense because there was already a championship team in place. The current edition of the Yankees is much like the roster that missed out on the playoffs in 2013 in the sense that it isn't ready to compete. Yankee fans got a taste of the future this past season. It would be in their best interest to wait to add reinforcements until 2018 when Sanchez and company are ready.

Yoenis Cespedes Expects To Land A Five Year Deal This Off-Season

Depending on who you ask Yoenis Cespedes is the top free agent bat this winter. Personally I would argue for the more consistent Edwin Encarnacian, but I understand why some National League teams may prefer Cespedes due to the likelihood he remains an outfielder for the entirety of his contract. Edwin, meanwhile, is likely to have to move to DH in the next few years if not sooner.

This extra demand for Cespedes puts the Mets in a tough spot. They made the playoffs last year despite suffering an insane amount of injuries. Next season they're getting back Matt Harvey, Jacob DeGrom, Steven Matz, and Zack Wheeler. Yet even with that potentially elite starting rotation it's tough to envision the Mets in the playoffs with their current lineup. Neil Walker accepting his qualifying offer is a plus but this offense struggled mightily down the stretch last year. Outside of Walker New York is currently relying on Michael Conforto, Jay Bruce, and Asdrubal Cabrera as top of the order bats. The Mets finished 26th in the league in runs per game last season.

A recent report from the New York Post suggests Cespedes could land a five year contract north of $130 million. This would seemingly take the Mets out of the running for him as they would prefer to give him a four year deal in the $100-$110 million range. What should worry Mets fans is that there are no shortage of teams interested in him. He has already been linked to the Giants, Dodgers, Nationals, and Yankees. It seems likely one of these teams will give Cespedes the fifth year he wants.

If the Mets remain unable, or unwilling, to match that sort of contract than it will ultimately be a test at how badly Yo wants to stay in New York. Anyone who watches baseball can tell you the trade to the Mets has re-ignited his career, and that he has brought a certain swagger and identity to the team that was previously lacking. Although his .530 slugging percentage in 2016 did not match the .604 number he posted with New York in 2015, he still belted 31 homers with 86 RBI. The most encouraging development for the 31-year-old, however, was his career best 9.4% walk rate that easily blows past his previous career high of 8.0%. If the Mets are unable to re-sign him they will reportedly turn their efforts to Jose Bautista and Dexter Fowler. 

Should The Pirates Really Be Trying To Trade Andrew McCutchen?

Earlier this off season it was reported that the Pittsburgh Pirates would be "quietly shopping" Andrew McCutchen this winter. At the time this seemed like nothing more than a click bait headline. Then this past week it comes out that the Mariners reached out to Pittsburgh with serious interest in the former MVP. Now this doesn't mean Cutch is getting traded soon. But it's definitely more likely than it was a month ago, which begs the question of whether or not the Pirates should be willing to deal their 30-year-old superstar coming off the worst season of his career?

The initial reason Pittsburgh would even consider trading McCutchen is his contract. Currently he has just one guaranteed year left on his deal, for next season at $14 million. He then has a club option for 2018 at $14.5 million. Even at his 2016 performance level that's a no brainer for the team to pick up. So basically he has two years left at an affordable rate. The Pirates have been competitive for the past half decade, but aren't exactly in position to give him a long term deal once this one expires. Even though he would be 32 it's unlikely the Pirates re sign him after this contract, barring his willingness to take a home town discount. 

So that gives the Pirates a few options. They can trade him now coming off a down season but with a full two years left on his deal, keep him for the entirety of the remaining contract, or trade him down the road if the team falls out of contention by the trade deadline. The problem with trading a superstar like McCutchen, especially with two full years left at a reasonable rate, is that the team with the star is always going to overvalue them because of past performance. 

That past performance saw McCutchen be regarded as a top five player in baseball as recently at this time a year ago. In a four year stretch from 2012-2015 McCutchen batted a wildly impressive .313/.404/.523 with an average of 25 homers and 19 stolen bases. He finished in the top five in MVP voting in each of those seasons, including a first place finish in 2013. He also won four silver sluggers and a gold glove during the span.

This made his 2016 come seemingly out of nowhere. His triple slash line fell to .256/.336/.430, which isn't terrible for an up the middle defender but it fell way short of the standard he had set for himself. The 24 homers were nice but Cutch saw his strikeout rate increase, walk rate decrease, and for the first time in his career was caught stealing more often than he succeeded. Despite the down year there remains some reason for optimism. From 2012-15 McCutchen had a .355 batting average on balls in play. That number fell to .297 in 2016. It makes sense for a BABIP to fall as a player ages but it's reasonable to expect he got a little unlucky this year in that department, though it doesn't explain the downward trending walk and strikeout rates.

Given the fact that it was just one "bad" season it seems likely the Pirates hold on to their star unless they are completely blown away. If they struggle in 2017 they could likely get a similar package of prospects come the trade deadline that they would have gotten this winter, especially if they find a desperate enough trading partner. More concerning perhaps even than the offensive woes McCutchen experienced this past season are the defensive ones. The advanced metrics suggest he lost a step this year and the Pirates have discussed moving him to right field. He has said he doesn't need to leave center field. That kind of discord is why a trade, though unlikely this off-season, remains possible.

Did Rick Porcello Really Deserve To Win The AL Cy Young Award?

Entering last night I thought the AL Cy Young race could be the closest of all the awards handed out this week. There was a real case to be made for all three finalists in Rick Porcello, Justin Verlander, and Corey Kluber. As tight as I thought the voting would be I was still surprised to hear Porcello won. The reason being I thought it meant voters gave too much importance to the 22 wins Porcello earned this year. However, after taking a closer look at the numbers the race was even tighter than I originally thought.

Let's start with the wins. 22 wins is good. But as we have learned wins are a flawed stat. Yes one can argue the starting pitcher's job is to win the game. But too often wins and losses are determined by things out of his control, such as his team's offense, defense, and bullpen. Many smart people think wins are entirely useless. If you want to tell me they have value I won't fight you to the death on that, but there is no way they have close to the value that ERA, WHIP, FIP, K/9, and BB/9 do.

I thought Verlander would win the award. As you can see in the table below he won most categories head to head against Porcello:

However, many of the categories Verlander "won" can be considered virtual ties because of how close the numbers were. For example, Verlander won ERA but only 3.04 to 3.15. He won innings pitched 227 to 223. He won WHIP 1.00 to 1.01. Porcello has slight edges in FIP (3.40 to 3.48) and complete games (3 to 2). 

If we exclude wins there were three categories where there was a significant difference: home runs, walks, and strikeouts. Oddly enough these are the three stats that pitchers truly control. For example, many people think hits are out of a pitchers control since your defense can have an affect on it. ERA, therefore, can be a little fluky since it involves hits given up. In my opinion there is still some skill involved in giving up hits, but it is more random than homers, walks, and strikeouts.

Getting back to the numbers Porcello had the edge in homers allowed (23 to 30) and BB/9 (1.3 to 2.3). He ranked second in the AL in BB/9 and first in strikeout to walk ratio. Verlander, meanwhile, had a huge edge in strikeouts (254 to 189). He led the American League. With the rest of the numbers being so close the decision could come down to what you value more in a pitcher: striking batters out or limiting walks and homers. Porcello won two of the three categories, which combined with the 22 wins could be the tie breaker.

Lastly let's take a look at the ballot. This is where the argument Verlander got robbed comes in. 

He received more first place than Porcello and was left off of two ballots entirely. That's insane. Whether or not you think Verlander should have finished first is one thing but there is no argument that he wasn't one of the five best pitchers in the American League this year. If we count those votes where he was left off as third place votes Verlander wins the Cy. That, of course, did not happen though and Porcello's numbers were actually much better than I originally thought. I would be fascinated to know if Porcello would have won the Cy with the same 16 wins Verlander had as opposed to the 22 he finished with, but ultimately am fine with him winning.

Breaking Down Corey Seager's Historic Rookie Season

First things first let's talk about what the Rookie of the Year award really means. Baseball is very different from basketball and football in the sense that it has a minor league system that everyone goes through before reaching the majors. That means guys from the same draft class become rookies in different years. It also means that some guys get called up midseason while others are starters on opening day. So when we look back at ROY results it should be with a grain of salt. A prime example is this year in the American League. Michael Fulmer won mostly because he was around longer than Gary Sanchez, who only played half a season.  

Regardless, the National League Rookie of the Year voting is going to wind up as easily the least controversial award handed out this week. On Monday it was announced Seager won it unanimously, edging out his teammate Kenta Maeda and second half sensation Trea Turner:

Seager is the latest in a long line of Dodgers players to win the the award. He is the 17th Dodger to do so, which means on average they have someone win it every four years. However, he is the first to do it since the 1996, which was the last of a five year stretch where a Dodger won NL ROY every season. 

Now let's talk about how good Seager is. Not only did he win ROY but he's listed as a finalist for NL MVP. He probably won't win that but in my opinion he should finish second to Kris Bryant. In 2016 Seager hit .308/.365/.512 with 26 homers and 40 doubles as the best hitter on a team that made it to the NLCS. That type of power for a young, up the middle defender is rare. In the NL this season he ranked second in offensive WAR, fourth in total WAR, seventh in batting average, 10th in slugging, fifth in runs, second in hits, fourth in total bases, and seventh in doubles. He turned 22 in April.

So where does Seager's season rank all time for rookie shortstops? His 26 homers fell four short of Nomar Garciaparra's record and his 137 OPS+ is the best for a rookie shortstop since 1901. For comparison Nomar's 1997 OPS+ was 123. He may have hit more homers but Seager was the better all around hitter. 

We are currently living in a golden era of young shortstops that includes Xander Bogaerts, Carlos Correa, and Francisco Lindor but right now Seager is the best of them all thanks to his power potential. When projecting power for young hitters one stat to look at are doubles. Seager finished seventh in the NL in doubles as a rookie. As has been the case with many other players before him it's reasonable to project that those doubles in the gap eventually start leaving the park as he reaches his prime.

Seager's historic rookie season and age have put him in a rare group of baseball players. If you were to start a team today from scratch the first pick would be Mike Trout. There's no real debating that at this point. But who would go second? In my opinion there's about six or seven guys you could make an argument for. The position players on that list would be Bryce Harper, Kris Bryant, Mookie Betts, Manny Machado, and now Seager. Add in the fact that he has been a top prospect since being the 18th overall pick in 2012 and it looks like we are witnessing the rise of baseball's next superstar.

Adam Jones, Chris Archer, And Nolan Arenado Will Be Representing Team USA In The WBC

Here we go. Last week Max Scherzer became the first player to commit to representing Team USA in the upcoming World Baseball Classic this March. We knew at the time that Mike Trout and Bryce Harper wouldn't be playing, but the hope was that enough stars would help fill out the roster. So far we are off to a good start. The 2006 Classic probably featured the best roster we've ever had. That year had Alex Rodriguez, Derek Jeter, Mark Teixeira, Chase Utley, and Jake Peavy all in their primes. If guys with rumored interest, such as Kris Bryant and Buster Posey, commit to playing then the 2017 team could end up being our best.

The biggest get from this trio is Nolan Arenado. Not only is he the best player of the three but he was also being recruited to play for Puerto Rico, which he would have been eligible for since his mother is from there. So not only does USA get one of the best third baseman in the world but they block a rival from getting him. The biggest knock on Arenado's game is that he isn't as good of a hitter away from Coors Field. However, this is unfair for two reasons. First because anybody would be a better hitter in Coors than they would be elsewhere.

Secondly he actually improved a lot on the road in 2016. His career triple slash line away from Coors is .261/.305/.457 but in 2016 he improved those numbers to .277/.340/.492. He has now led the National League in homers, RBI, and total bases each of the past two seasons. Additionally Arenado has won a gold glove every year he has been in the league. He's a top three third basemen in baseball and his addition to the roster will move Kris Bryant to left field should he join as well.

That doesn't mean Archer and Jones should be overlooked. Hopefully another ace is on the way and Archer can be the number three, but it isn't the end of the world if he ends up being our two. In the 2013 Classic USA had Ryan Vogelsong in the rotation so it can't get much worse than that. A quick look at Archer's 2016 season shows he wasn't very good. And he wasn't. He went 9-19 with a 4.02 ERA. But a deeper look shows he was a little unlucky. The wins and losses are mostly a result of playing for a 68 win Rays team and his strikeout and walk rates were in line with his career norms. 

What stands out is his 4.02 ERA. Before this season his previous career high was 3.33. The jump can be attributed to the insane 30 home runs he gave up this season. The reason this can be considered unlucky is because he had a home run to fly ball ratio of 12.2%, which is much higher than his career average of 8.2%. Home runs can be fluky year to year and ratios like this tend to even out over time. Expect Archer to bounce back next year. He finished fifth in the 2015 AL Cy Young voting and is a great addition to the USA rotation.

Lastly there isn't much to say about Jones. He's a great addition to the roster in large part because he was on the 2013 team so hopefully can use that experience to help himself and his teammates. Jones should be locked into center field duties thanks to the four gold gloves on his resume. He's as consistent of a hitter as they come with at least 25 homers and 80 RBI in every season since 2011.

The Astros Are One Of The Most Aggressive Teams So Far This Off-Season Following A Disappointing Year

It's easy to forget now but the Houston Astros were one of the most trendy picks to advance to the World Series back in Spring Training. The thought process made sense. Houston is a young team that was coming off an 86 win season in 2015, which resulted in a division series loss to the eventual champion Kansas City Royals. However, instead of taking that leap to the World Series Houston saw it's pitching staff fall apart. Reigning Cy Young winner Dallas Keuchel saw his ERA rise from 2.48 a season ago to 4.55 this year. The team ERA as a whole rose from 3.59 in 2015 to 4.07 in 2016. Ultimately the Astros regressed by two wins and fell short of postseason play. 

Now just a week into the offseason they have been one of the most aggressive teams in talking to agents and general managers for star players. Houston, with just two players signed after 2017, has the payroll flexibility to make a big free agent splash. They also have the farm system to pull off a blockbuster trade. So far they have already been linked to Miguel Cabrera, Edwin Encarnacion, Brian McCann, and Carlos Beltran. Any of these guys would add a lot to the impressive core of Jose Altuve, Carlos Correa, George Springer, and Alex Bregman. 

Cabrera would obviously be the crown jewel here, but in order to acquire him Houston would have to trade Bregman plus a handful of upper level prospects. The Tigers have mentioned a desire to shed contracts and get younger this offseason, and Miggy has seven years and $220 million left on his current deal. Still it seems likely Detroit holds off and keeps their future Hall of Fame first baseman. Rarely are teams able to figure out the right compensation in both prospects and salary in these sorts of mega deals. Plus the Tigers don't have to trade him unless they're absolutely blown away by an offer.

Encarnacion could be a good fit since his services wouldn't require giving up any prospects. He fills a hole at first base and has averaged 38 homers per season over the last five years. In 2016 he hit 42 to go along with 127 RBI and a .263/.357/.529 triple slash line. The problem is, as the top free agent bat on the market, Edwin is going to command a lot of money. The Blue Jays and Red Sox figure to be heavily involved, which could cause the contract to get out of Houston's price range. Even with a ton of flexibility the Astros are unlikely to shell out a giant contract. Their win now roster could be a factor in ownership deciding to go for it, but it's unlikely.

That brings us to McCann and Beltran. Of these four guys McCann is the one I see most likely ending up in Houston. Thanks to Gary Sanchez the Yankees no longer have a need for the 32-year-old McCann. With a reasonable two years and $34 million (plus a vesting 2019 option) left on his deal it's the sort of contract the Astros could easily take on. McCann could split catcher and DH duties with Evan Gattis and would provide a lefty power bat to a mostly right handed lineup. Surprisingly McCann has hit at least 20 homers in nine straight seasons, and in ten of his last 11. 

Beltran would be an interesting fit as a veteran switch hitter. It's incredible how much interest there is in the 39-year-old DH as he's also been linked to the Rangers and Red Sox. Beltran hit 29 homers last year and is a proven postseason hitter, which is a big factor for contending teams. The one worry with Beltran is that he cooled off significantly in the second half following his trade to Texas. His slugging percentage fell nearly 100 points from .546 in New York to .451 with the Rangers. While most teams would prefer to give him a one year deal the demand may require a team to give him two. Although it was 12 years ago Beltran has a good history playing for the Astros. In just 90 games for them back in 2004 he hit 23 homers and stole 28 bases following a mid season trade from the Royals. 

While any of these guys would be a big get for the Astros it won't make them a championship contender unless they also upgrade the pitching. Keuchel isn't as bad as he showed in 2016, but he's also not as good as he was in his award winning 2015. The free agent market for starting pitching is one of the worst in recent memory so Houston will have to get creative either in a trade or by signing some high upside reclamation projects. The good news is so far management is being aggressive in trying to upgrade the roster. Their young core of position players is too good to not do everything possible to get back to the playoffs.

Max Scherzer Commits To Team USA In The Upcoming World Baseball Classic

NL #CyYoung candidate @Max_Scherzer will pitch for Team USA in the 2017 @WBCBaseball per @jonmorosi. #MLBNHotStove pic.twitter.com/tZwPaqarvG

— MLB Network (@MLBNetwork) November 8, 2016

This is a huge get for fans of the World Baseball Classic, as well as fans of Team USA. The biggest problem for the past three WBCs has been a lack of star power in the tournament. This has especially been the case with Team USA, who's roster has never reflected the talent it could put on the field if the best players played. 

Off the top of my head USA could field an outfield of Bryce Harper, Mike Trout, and Mookie Betts. It could feature Nolan Arenado, Kris Bryant, Anthony Rizzo, Corey Seager, and many other stud hitters in the infield. The rotation could be comprised of aces such as Clayton Kershaw, Madison Bumgarner, Noah Syndergaard, Stephen Strasburg, Corey Kluber, etc. The possibilities are endless. 

USA won't ever get ALL those guys to commit but they need several of them if they want fans to take this thing seriously. In three tournaments our country has a combined 10-10 record and has finished no higher than fourth. That's not good for a sport we consider to be our national pastime.

The WBC is coming back in March of 2017 and with this Scherzer news there is beginning to be a bit of a buzz about it. It was reported recently that neither Trout nor Harper are on the 50 man preliminary roster for USA. While that's disappointing to hear there are names on the list that are worth getting excited about. They include Bryant, Arenado, Kluber, Syndergaard, Jake Arrieta, David Price, Giancarlo Stanton, Dellin Betances, Andrew Miller, Buster Posey, and more. 

It's exciting to think about the potential American roster if even half of those guys commit. It's a tough spot for a lot of players. The WBC will run from March 7th to March 22nd, which is right in the middle of Spring Training and could affect their season preparation. At the same time it's not too often you get a chance to represent your country. Hopefully more players will be following Scherzer's lead, who is the first to commit to playing despite leading the National League in innings pitched this year.

What Teams That Have Never Won The World Series Are In The Best Position To Do So?

This week has been all about how tortured the fan bases of the Cubs and Indians have been. We all know the numbers by now. The Cubs haven't won since 1908 and the Indians since 1948. However, there are eight MLB franchises that have never won a World Series. A couple have never even been. That doesn't mean they're any more tortured than Chicago and Cleveland, though. In fact they're definitely less tortured - at least most of them. It obviously won't happen this year, but let's take a look at which organization is best positioned to capture their first World Series.

8. Padres

The Padres are a mess. Two years ago they went all in and acquired Matt Kemp, James Shields, Justin upton, Will Myers and Craig Kimbrel. Then they back tracked and traded them all for prospects. Then everyone found out they lied about the medical histories of same of the players they traded. Now teams are going to have to think twice about trading with them again. Throw in an unimpressive big league roster combined with zero top prospects and that's not a recipe for success.

So where does that leave San Diego? During that crazy 2015 offseason they shipped off seven of their top 11 prospects according to Baseball America. Myers has turned into their lone bright spot as he hit 28 homers this past season. However, they finished 68-94 and tied with the Reds for the worst record in the National League.

7. Brewers

2011 feels like a very, very long time ago. That year the Brewers rode Ryan Braun and Prince Fielder in their primes to the NLCS against the Cardinals. Unfortunately for them they ran into a buzz saw named David Freese and just like that their window had closed. Few teams in baseball are positioned worse moving forward than Milwaukee. Braun is still good. He hit .305 with 30 homers in only 135 games in 2016. With the way baseball contracts have been going lately he's probably actually worth the four years and $70 million remaining on his deal. However, Milwaukee will have to eat a good portion of that money to receive desirable prospects in return.

Making matters worse is the fact that they have to play in the same division as the Cubs, Cardinals, and Pirates. Those teams are set up so well in the coming years that Milwaukee's best move will be completely hit the reset button the way the Cubs and Astros have done recently. Collect some high draft choices, trade for prospects, and see what happens. They'll also have to take what they can get for Braun since by the time they are ready to compete he will be past his prime.

6. Rockies

I get that Coors Field is one of the most unique home fields in all of sports. I get that balls fly out of there more than any other ballpark. But my goodness you would think a franchise that has been around since 1993 would figure out how to develop pitchers there. Can't they target ground ball pitchers in free agency or allocate all their draft capital to selecting arms? I'm sure they've tried but it's hard for me to believe they haven't been able to figure it out. 

The Rockies made the World Series in 2007 but have done little since with just one playoff berth in that time. They have one of the best players in baseball in Nolan Arenado but are currently not set up well to surround him with a strong supporting cast. In 2016 their offense ranked second in MLB in runs per game but their team ERA ranked 28th. Until they figure out how to improve the pitching we won't see them in October or beyond.

5. Rays

Once upon a time there was a Cinderella story called the Tampa Bay Rays. They were the first small market team since the earl 2000s Oakland A's to crack the code of winning the unfair game of baseball. It all began in 2008 when they were the first team to truly emphasize defense and they defeated the reigning champion Boston Red Sox in the ALCS to win the pennant. Unfortunately they lost the World Series in five games to the Phillies and have yet to get past the first round of the playoffs since.

In the six year stretch from 2008-2013 Tampa Bay made the playoffs four times. Their win totals by year went 97, 84, 96, 91, 90, and 92. During this time the franchise had an uncanny act for replacing star veterans with undervalued contributors. But a team can only lose so much before the run is over. In the last few years they have lost manager Joe Maddon, GM Andrew Freidman, ace David Price, James Shields, and many more. They have been under .500 each of the past three seasons and are in the middle of a rebuilding process. It will be at least a few years before we see them playing in October again.

4. Mariners

The Mariners have underrated been one of the worst franchises in sports over the past fifty years. They have never been to the World Series and have not even made the playoffs since 2001. Sure, they won an insane 116 games that year but as we learned recently from the Warriors it don't mean a thing without the ring. One of the most frustrating aspects of being a Mariners fan the past decade has to be how they have wasted Felix Hernandez's prime. Since 2009 he has finished in the top eight in Cy Young voting six times but has yet to make a postseason start. He is signed through 2019 but in 2016 had his worst ERA since 2007.

It feels like every year Seattle is a trendy pick to win the World Series. In recent seasons they have added star free agents like Robinson Cano and Nelson Cruz. They have young pitching with Taijuan Walker and James Paxton. But for some reason they just haven't been able to put it all together. They have some holes to fill this offseason but it shouldn't be a huge surprise to see them capture one of the American League's two wild card spots in 2017.

3. Rangers

The Texas Rangers entered the 2016 playoffs as the number one seed in the American League. Many thought this team was a fluke, due to a miniscule run differential, and they got exposed in a three game sweep at the hands of Toronto. The loss hurt because of how hard the team tried to make a deep playoff run at the trade deadline. Over the past two summer they have acquired Cole Hamels, Jonathan Lucroy, and Carlos Beltran. They have two first round exits to show for it.   

Moving forward the club will build around co-aces Hamels and Yu Darvish, rookie sensation Nomar Mazara, and veterans Lucroy and Adrian Beltre. Re-signing shortstop turned outfielder Ian Desmond should be the team's top priority, in addition to getting back end of the bullpen help. 

2. Astros

Everyone and their mother was picking Houston to make it to the World Series back in Spring Training. The thought process made sense. The team had tanked for a few years, collected a group of good, young players, and broke through last year with 86 wins and a playoff appearance. That wins total dropped just two in 2016 to 84 but wasn't enough to make the playoffs. A lot of positives happened this year, though. Jose Altuve became a MVP candidate, Carlos Correa had a good sophomore season, and George Springer continued to hit.

The problem for the Astros was the pitching. Reigning Cy Young winner Dallas Keuchel regressed badly. His ERA rose form 2.48 in 2015 to 4.55 in 2016. The team's ERA also rose from 3.59 in 2015 to 4.07 in 2016. A part of that was Keuchel but they need to improve in this area to truly contend. While this roster may not be complete yet, it is young and talented enough to a bright future. Houston fans should be excited.

1. Nationals

The Nationals are not only positioned well of the teams that have never won, they are one of the most well put together teams in all of baseball. In a weak division with the Mets, Braves, Marlins, and Phillies they figure to be the odds on favorite to repeat as NL East champs. They have an ace in Max Scherzer. Trea Turner looks like the real deal. But the championship hopes of Washington rest on their two former number one picks.

Let's start with Bryce Harper. First of all, what the fuck happened? As a 22-year-old in 2015 Harper became the youngest unanimous MVP of all time. Let that sink in for a minute. He belted 42 homers with a .330/.460/.649 triple slash line. This year those numbers fell to 24 homers and a .243/.373/.441 triple slash. Harper was due for regression in the batting average department due to an unsustainable BABIP, but what happened to the power? There were rumors all season of Bryce playing through a shoulder injury. It makes sense since his stats dropped off after a white hot April when he supposedly suffered the injury. We may find out more this offseason but regardless it would be foolish not to expect a bounce back from Harper.

Now there's the case of Stephen Strasburg. It's tough to think Washington wouldn't have won their Division Series against the Dodgers if they had him. Since Strasburg made his debut in 2010 the Nationals have made three postseason appearances but Strasburg has just one playoff start on his resume. Whether it's an innings limit a six man rotation the Nationals need to find a way to keep this guy healthy for October. A Scherzer-Strasburg led playoff rotation could be deadly. Hopefully we get the chance to see it come 2017.